Blog
PROBATION ELIGIBILITY: NEW LIMITATIONS
Texas Juries Can No Longer Recommend Community Supervision When Victim is Child Under 15, Elderly or Disabled
By: Houston Criminal Defense Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair
Community supervision, or probation as most people know it, has been defined by federal courts as an “imprisonment substitute” because the criminal sentence is not served in a penal institution. See: United States v. Elkins, 176 F.3d 1016, 1020 (7th Cir. 1999).
In the State of Texas community supervision is a privilege, not a right. See: Flores v. State, 904 S.W.2d 129, 130 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1050 (1996). It is a punishment alternative that must either be agreed to between the state and defendant, ordered by a judge or recommended by a jury.
The Flores court specifically stated that “there is no fundamental right to receive probation [community supervision]; it is within the discretion of the trial court to determine whether an individual is entitled to probation.” Id.
In Texas, community supervision can be granted either by the trial judge or assessed by the jury. See: Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.12(3)(a); (4)(d).
While there is no fundamental right to community supervision, § 42.12(3)(a) requires that the judge impose community supervision “in the best interest of justice, the public, and the defendant” – all three of which are legitimate government purposes. Flores, 904 S.W.2d at 131.
Similarly, in federal court a district judge may depart from the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines’ prison recommendation and impose probation but only after he/she has considered all the sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3353. See: United States v. Toohey, 448 F.3d 542, 546-47 (2d Cir. 2006).
The discretion of the trial judge in Texas to grant, and the jury’s authority to assess, community supervision are likewise limited by statute. For example, Subsection 3g(a) of § 42.12(3) prohibits the trial judge from granting community supervision:
(1) to a defendant adjudged guilty of an offense under:
(A) Section 19.02, Penal Code (Murder);
(B) Section 19.03, Penal Code (Capital murder);
(C )Section 21.11(a)(1), Penal Code (Indecency with a child);
(D) Section 20,04, Penal Code (Aggravated kidnapping);
(E) Section 22.021, Penal Code (Aggravated sexual assault);
(F) Section 29.03, Penal Code (Aggravated robbery);
(G) Chapter 481, Health and Safety Code, for which punishment is increased under:
(i) Section 481.140, Health and Safety Code; or
(ii) Section 481.134(c), (d), (e), or (f), Health and Safety Code, if it is shown that the defendant has been previously convicted of an offense for which punishment was increased under any of those subsections;
(H) Section 22.011, Penal Code (Sexual assault); or
(I) [2 Versions: As added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., ch. 405] Section22.04(a)(1), Penal Code (Injury to a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual), if the offense is punishable as a felony of the first degree and the victim of the offense is a child; or
(I) [2 Versions: As added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., ch. 593]Section 43.25, Penal Code (Sexual performance by a child); or
(2) to a defendant when it is shown that a deadly weapon as defined in Section 1.07, Penal Code, was used or exhibited during the commission of a felony offense or during immediate flight there from, and that the defendant used or exhibited the deadly weapon or was a party to the offense and knew that a deadly weapon would be used or exhibited. On an affirmative finding under this subdivision, the trial court shall enter the finding in the judgment of the court. On an affirmative finding that the deadly weapon was a firearm, the court shall enter that finding in its judgment.
(b) If there is an affirmative finding under Subsection (a)(2) in the trial of a felony of the second degree or higher that the deadly weapon used or exhibited was a firearm and the defendant is granted community supervision, the court may order the defendant confined in the institutional division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for not less than 60 and not more than 120 days. At any time after the defendant has served 60 days in the custody of the institutional division, the sentencing judge, on his own motion or on motion of the defendant, may order the defendant released to community supervision. The institutional division shall release the defendant to community supervision after he has served 120 days.
The two revisions under Subsection (I) reflect the hard line stand taken by the Texas Legislature in 2007 against sex offenders. Increased numbers of high profile cases involving teachers having sex with students, penal staff sexually abusing juvenile inmates, and sexual predators trolling the Internet for young victims created the legislative attitude that incarceration is the only penological way to deal with sex offenders in cases involving young victims. The Legislature also elected to restrict the authority of juries to recommend community supervision. Section 4 of § 42.12 now provides:
(a) A jury that imposes confinement as punishment for an offense may recommend to the judge that the judge suspend the imposition of the sentence and place the defendant on community supervision. A judge shall suspend the imposition of the sentence and place the defendant on community supervision if the jury makes that recommendation in the verdict.
(b) If the jury recommends to the judge that the judge place the defendant on community supervision, the judge shall place the defendant on community supervision for any period permitted under Section 3(b) or 3(c) of this article, as appropriate.
(c) A judge may increase the maximum period of community supervision in the manner provided by Section 22(c) or Section 22A of this article.
(d) A defendant is not eligible for community supervision under this section if the defendant:
(1) is sentenced to a term of imprisonment that exceeds 10 years;
(2) is convicted of a state jail felony for which suspension of the imposition of the sentence occurs automatically under Section 15(a);
(3) does not file a sworn motion under Subsection (e) of this section or for whom the jury does not enter in the verdict a finding that the information contained in the motion is true;
(4) is convicted of an offense for which punishment is increased under Section 481.134(c), (d), (e), or (f), Health and Safety Code, if it is shown that the defendant has been previously convicted of an offense for which punishment was increased under any one of those subsections; or
(5) [2 Versions: As added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., ch. 593] is convicted of an offense listed in Section 3g(a)(1)(C), (E), or (H), if the victim of the offense was younger than 14 years of age at the time the offense was committed;
(5) [2 Versions: As added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., ch. 1205] is adjudged guilty of an offense under Section 19.02, Penal Code.
(6) is convicted of an offense listed in Section 3g(a)(1)(D), if the victim of the offense was younger than 14 years of age at the time the offense was committed and the actor committed the offense with the intent to violate or abuse the victim sexually; or
(7) is convicted of an offense listed in Section 3g(a)(1)(I).
(e) A defendant is eligible for community supervision under this section only if before the trial begins the defendant files a written sworn motion with the judge that the defendant has not previously been convicted of a felony in this or any other state, and the jury enters in the verdict a finding that the information in the defendant’s motion is true.
(f) The minimum period of community supervision under this section for an offense under Section 34.04, Penal Code, punishable as a Class A misdemeanor with a minimum term of confinement of six months is one year.
The Legislature effectively said the juries can no longer recommend community supervision in the following crimes if the victim is 14 years of age or younger: indecency with a child; aggravated kidnapping; aggravated sexual assault; sexual assault; and injury to a child, elderly individual, or disabled person.
Interestingly, however, juries can still recommend community supervision for criminal defendants who kidnap, sexually assault, or injure anyone from ages 15 to 65. Furthermore, juries can still recommend community supervision for individuals convicted of murder or aggravated robbery so long as the jury recommends a sentence of less than 10 years.
There are several fundamental rules about community supervision criminal defense attorneys must be aware of:
The trial court cannot assess community supervision as a sentencing option for certain crimes listed in 3g. Art. 42.12 § 3g(a)(1)(C).
Community supervision requires a finding of guilt and formal assessment of punishment. Art. 42.12 § 2(2).
Deferred adjudication, on the other hand, must be entered before a formal finding of guilt. Rodriquez v. State, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 2013 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] March 16, 2006).
The terms community supervision and probation are frequently used interchangeably. Howard v. State, 2003 Tex.App. LEXIS 4298 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] May 22, 2003).
The trial judge has discretion in determining the conditions to be imposed under community supervision. Speth v. State, 6 S.W.3d 530, 533 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999).
A specific condition of community supervision will be found invalid only if it has no relationship to the offense charged, it relates to conduct that is not in itself criminal, and forbids or requires conduct that is not reasonably related to the future criminality of a defendant or does not serve the statutory ends of community supervision. Lacy v. State, 875 S.W.2d 3, 5 (Tex.App.-Tyler, 1994, no pet).
In order to preserve for appeal a challenge to a condition of community supervision, the defendant must make a timely and specific objection. Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a).
A court of appeals recently had an opportunity to determine whether a trial court had the authority to place a “3g” defendant on “shock” probation. See: Texas v. Dunbar, 2008 Tex.App. LEXIS 7854 (Tex.App.-Beaumont, Oct. 15, 2008). The court held that the defendant, Wendy R. Dunbar, “was ineligible for community supervision on the date the trial court suspended execution on her four year sentence for indecency with a child by sexual contact.” Id., at LEXIS 2.
Dunbar’s crime occurred in June 1996. In June 1997 the trial court deferred adjudication of guilt and placed Dunbar on community supervision for 10 years. In April 2007 the State moved to adjudicate guilt. The trial court in September 2007 convicted Dunbar and imposed a four-year sentence of incarceration. In December 2007 Dunbar filed a motion to impose community supervision, and in February 2008 the trial court signed “a shock community supervision order.” Id. The State appealed and the appeals court found:
”’[C]ommunity supervision is not a sentence or even a part of a sentence.’ In this case, the execution on the sentence is at issue, not the sentence itself. The State has appealed an order that ‘arrests or modifies a judgment.’ The judgment includes the sentence but is not limited to the sentence. Because a community supervision order arrests or modifies a judgment, [Tex. Code Crim. Proc.] Article 44.01(a)(2) authorizes the State to appeal a shock community supervision order. The State may appeal an order that modifies a judgment regardless of the legal grounds for the appeal. The notice of appeal filed in this case invoked our appellate jurisdiction and the State was statutorily authorized to pursue the appeal. Therefore, we turn to the merits of the State’s issue.
”Within 180 days from the date the execution of a sentence actually begins, the judge of the court that imposed the sentence may suspend further execution of the sentence and place the defendant on community supervision. This grant of power to the trial judge is not unlimited, however; the shock community supervision statute expressly requires that ‘the defendant is otherwise eligible for community supervision under this article[.]’ Judge-ordered community supervision is not available to a defendant who has been adjudged guilty of indecency with a child by sexual contact.” Id., at LEXIS 2-3 [Internal citations omitted].
Dunbar is clearly a harbinger of things to come. The appeals court have not had an opportunity to rule of challenges to the 2007 amendments to § 42.12. In all likelihood, the amendments will be upheld, and any illegal granting of community supervision to ineligible defendants will result in reversal as in Dunbar.
The logical question to be resolved, however, is whether the 2007 legislative amendments to § 42.12, which became effective September 1, 2007, apply to offenses that occurred prior to that effective date. Both the federal and Texas constitutions forbid ex post facto law. See: U.S. Const. art. I, §§ 9 cl. 3, 10 cl. 1; Tex. Const. art. I, § 16. An ex post facto law violation occurs when legislature changes a punishment and inflicts a greater punishment than the law attached to a criminal offense when committed. See: Carmell v. Texas, 529 U.S. 512, 522-25 (2000); Rodriquez v. State, 93 S.W.3d 60, 66 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002).
Altering and changing the conditions of a punishment does not necessarily establish an ex post facto violation. For example, Texas courts have rejected ex post facto claims in the following situations:
Defendant had been charged with indecency with a child and placed on community supervision without an adjudication of guilt. Before expiration of his community supervision, State filed a motion to revoke the supervision. The trial court adjudicated defendant’s guilt but once again placed him on community supervision with condition that he register as a sex offender. The defendant challenged the sex offender registration requirement as an ex post facto violation. The court rejected that argument, finding that the defendant was not subjected to a greater punishment, nor had the punishment been changed. See: Cooper v. State, 2 S.W.3d 500 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1999).
A juvenile defendant challenged a September 1, 2003 amendment that changed the eligibility for placement in the Texas Youth Commission. Even though the defendant’s original adjudication of guilt occurred before September 1, 2003, the violation of his probation that led to his commitment to the Texas Youth Commission occurred after September 1, 2003; therefore, there was no ex post violation. See: In re U.G.V., 199 S.W.3d 1 (2005).
3
Juvenile defendant challenged change in law that required him to submit to DNA sample as ex post facto violation because law not in effect at time of offense. Court rejected the challenge. See: In re D.L.C., 124 S.W.3d 354 (Tex.App-Fort Worth 2003).
State argued on appeal that the statute used to enhance defendant’s DWI punishment was in effect when the defendant engaged in the conduct at the issue. The appeals court agreed, saying that since the enhancement statute did not change after the defendant’s arrest, the statute did not assign more severe criminal or penal consequences to his conduct than did the law in place when the alleged criminal conduct occurred. See: State v. Pieper, 231 S.W.3d 9 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2007).
These cases, however, do not end the constitutional inquiry. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that changes of parole guidelines may violate the ex post facto clause if prisoners are “unquestionably disadvantaged” by changes that create a “significant risk” of increased incarceration. See: Lynce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433, 446-47 (1997). The Lynce court found that the retroactive cancellation of early release credits having the effect of returning the parolee to prison violated the ex post facto clause because it “prolonged the imprisonment” and therefore “unquestionably disadvantaged” the parolee. Id. The federal courts have found ex post facto violation in the following circumstances:
Ex post facto violation by retroactive application of more restrictive standards for evaluating parole eligibility. See: Mickens-Thomas v. Vaughn, 321 F.3d 374, 390-91 (3d Cir. 2003).
Ex post facto violation by retroactive application of amended parole statute that would make defendant permanently ineligible for parole. See: Fender v. Thompson, 883 F.2d 303, 307 (4th Cir. 1989).
Ex post facto violation for retroactive application of regulation that eliminated right to individual hearing when parolee convicted of felony while on parole. Kellogg v. Shoemaker, 46 F.3d 503, 509-10 (6th Cir. 1995).
Ex post facto violation when change in parole regulation removed prisoner’s right to recoup lost good-time credits. See: Hunter v. Ayers, 336 F.3d 1007, 1011 (9th Cir. 2003).
Ex post facto violation by retroactive application of amendment removing earned good time credits because it was substantial change that was not foreseeable. See: Smith v. Scott, 223 F.3d 1191, 1196 (10th Cir. 2000).
Ex post facto violation because prisoner showed “significant risk that his punishment will be increased” by retroactive application of new federal re-parole guidelines. See: Fletcher v. Reilly, 433 F.3d 867, 879 (D.C. Cir. 2006).
The State will undoubtedly respond to ex post facto challenges to the 2007 amendments to § 42.12 by saying that probation/community supervision is a privilege, not a right, and that the elimination of the privilege did not make the punishment greater but rather removed a privileged benefit attached to the punishment. The problem is that the State’s argument does not meet constitutional muster under the Lynce rationale. The removal of probation/community supervision eligibility certainly created “prolonged incarceration” potential and therefore a defendant whose offense occurred before September 1, 2007 would be “unquestionably disadvantaged” by application of the 2007 amendments to his case.
Therefore, a criminal defense attorney representing a defendant whose offense occurred before September 1, 2007 must timely file a sworn motion proving up probation under 42.12(4)(A)(e) which provides that: “A defendant is eligible for community supervision under this section only if before the trial begins the defendant files a written sworn motion with the judge that the defendant has not previously been convicted of a felony in this or any other state, and the jury enters in the verdict a finding that the information in the defendant’s motion is true.”
Under this article, a criminal defendant has a two-fold burden. First, he must file a “sworn motion,” and, second, he must prove that he has never been convicted of a felony. The sworn motion and proof are separate, independent requirements. The mere filing of a sworn motion stating that the defendant does not have a prior felony conviction is an insufficient showing that the defendant is eligible for community supervision from a jury. See, Palasota v. State, 460 S.W.2d 137, 140-41 (Tex.Crim.App. 1970). See also: Beyince v. State, 954 S.W.2d 878 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1997 pet. ref’d).
If the court rejects the motion and declares the 2007 amendments to § 42.12 applicable to pre-September 1, 2007 offenses, the attorney must object and preserve the issue for appeal.
By: Houston Criminal Defense Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair
Take the first step toward protecting your freedom by contacting us now
Testimonials
John T. Floyd Law Firm
3730 Kirby Drive # 750, Houston
-
If you have hired attorneys that meet the Webster dictionary definition, ie: "Attorney " is a person that has a law degree, will not be totally honest, can take your money … More and not earn it, will put you off until he is ready to talk to you, and/or never study your case to be able to defend you. Mr. Floyd is the only attorney that doesn't fit that definition!! You will be delighted to have Mr. John Floyd in your corner! Not one attorney that I have ever met that would ever return a check that I sent to him, because he said I paid him too much! Wow! That right there should tell you something about his integrity!!!!! He has a very calm demeanor and doesn't stretch the truth even if you don't want to hear it, he will tell you the truth. Call and set up an appointment with him and judge for yourself. You are wasting time and money on any other attorney, just hire the best, Mr. Floyd.
-
John T. Floyd and his team are some of the best people! I was able to get a second opinion from them on legal advice. His team has been honest, kind, and very informative which has … More been a huge blesssing.
-
I highly recommend John T. Floyd Lawfirm. They are truly knowledgeable and willing to go the extra mile to defend your innocence. Psalms 35
-
Outstanding!Professional knowledge. Rich experiences. Good outcome.
-
-
The best lawyer I ever encounter with a very good personality. He’s very professional and he will go far and beyond for his clients best interest. He’s definitely a 5 star attorney … More when it comes to delivering. I couldn’t be more happier that I hired him !! 👏👏👏👏
-
-
I can honestly say from what I have seen so far, Floyd is a compassionate soul who cares for his client's. Floyd is by far very knowledgeable in this area. He's currently … More assisting my [Father] on a sex assault. We are all suffering so much as my father is an elder man, but we have faith in God, and Mr. Floyd he can dismissed this outrageous allegation soon. Thank you, yoli
-
I had wonderful experience with this law firm. They were so helpful and knowledgeable of the process.my case was dismissed because of Mr John T Floyd,thank you for everything .
-
I am very happy today my case dismissed God bless Mr John T Floyd very good lawyer thanks you so mush sir
-
I had a great experience with this Law Firm, the kind staff helped me locate a Lawyer even though they were unable to take my case.
They were very helpful, kind and returned my call … More in a timely manner. I would definitely recommend them and use them in the future. -
I can tell that Jone is an excellent attorney in Houston. Personally, he is a great man. In addition to great service and amazing results. Recommended
-
Mr. Floyd is an incredible attorney and human being. He cares about your case, the facts, the law, and your life! I am sorry for whatever situation you are going through, but choosing … More Mr. Floyd, his firm, and their professional experience to help you, will be the best decision you ever make!
-
John T Floyd is a straight shooter! He was very direct and responsive to my phone calls and questions. I was in awe of his knowledge, and professional decorum! The best decision that … More you could make is to schedule a consultation with him before considering anyone else!
-
I asked the Law Office of John T. Floyd a very important question regarding the legal aspects of purchasing a firearm with a deferred adjudication charge. They answered the question … More very professionally and accurately and I was quite pleased with the information that was shared. I recommend this law firm because they are very honest and will work for you and with you.
-
I’ve never been one to write reviews but this time I couldn’t pass up the opportunity to say something. I had some serious legal questions I needed answers to concerning Texas laws. … More Being I’m from another state, I found and reached out to Attorney John Floyd for the answers. Mr Floyd listened to to my requests and told me what he need from me and went out of his way to get me the answers. Very polite, straightforward and professional, I can’t thank him enough for all he’s done. Whatever your legal case may be, I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend Mr Floyd.
-
John & Chris helped my family member get a reduced charge and acceptable plea agreement in place. Their compassion, attention to every detail was what helped carry the day.Truly … More the best of the best.P
-
Mr. Floyd is both ethical and loyal to his clients; two qualities that are hard to find specially in lawyers. I'd definitely recommend him to anyone.Positive
Professionalism …More … More -
Mr. John was very helpful and truly was the reason why my case was dismissed. Thank you so much Mr. John I truly recommend everyone in need to work with him.
-
His service to the community and diligence to helping his clients speaks for its self! Not to mention the many articles, papers and TV appearances that speak to his intellect
-
John has given Excellent service and have been very friendly and extremely helpful to us. I highly recommend this law firm
-
This law firm is diligent, responsive and succeeded in getting my case dismissed. 10/10 would recommend.
-
super knowledgeable, good attitude, would definitely recommend him
-
Very helpful, knowledgeable and honest.
-
John is an amazing person and lawyer who is actually very understanding of how anxious I got and although it was hard to reach him sometimes because of his schedule, but never worry … More he is on top of things. He is very organized, very smart. I had the experience to go through a trial with him, and he always plans ahead well and is actually open and receptive to any ideas and comments I had and he was quick to decide which is right to use at the moment. I really appreciated working with him and Chris. Great lawyers and great people. As I was reminded by John, I am adding that the Jury reached a not guilty decision on the original charge and on a lesser charge in just 25 minutes. It took more time to write the charge and instructions for the jury than it took them to reach a decision.
-
Highly recommend John T Floyd law firm, great response time and demeanor.I was researching an on-going criminal case, when I found an informative article written by John Floyd (about … More the perils of expert testimony). I called his office, and was very pleased to receive a timely call back. Not only was Mr. Floyd candid and helpful, but he had the kindest demeanor of any attorney that I've dealt with. I am so glad to have found this firm.
-
Although I am not a client, John Floyd contacted me the same day I sent an email requesting advice, answered my questions and even when further to assist with my issue and communicated … More with me the next day. A true credit to his profession and I can only imagine how well he provides services to his actual clients!
-
I give Mr. Floyd 10 Stars if they were available so I'm giving him five that's all that's available. The first time I left a message for him it was on a Friday after … More 5 p.m. and within 15 minutes he called me back I told him I needed to buy a lotto ticket because that has never happened. I knew from our chat and him calling me back that he was different from any attorney I've tried to talk to left messages never got called back they didn't even know what I needed and neither did Mr. Floyd but he did call me back. I was very interested in meeting with mr. Floyd about my case because I felt he was very transparent honest and genuine. If you've ever dealt with attorneys they don't have those traits but Mr. Floyd does. He was very honest with me told me what I could and could not do with my case. He is not egotistical he's very compassionate and he actually reads the documents you sent him unbelievable that's never happened. He will be the only lawyer I refer to anyone that needs his expertise. If you're in need of a criminal defense attorney please give John T Floyd a call you will not be disappointed.
-
Mr John is a great human being and a very knowledgeable attorney. He has always called me back promptly,advised me very clearly and never rushed our conversation. i was wrongfully accused … More and Mr John had my case DISMISSED!! on the day of trial after fighting for me for two years. I am very thankful to the John T. Floyd Law Firm. You will not go wrong with John. Mr John you deserve way more then 5 stars.Thank youShaikh.
-
John Floyd Law Firm is highly recommended for your legal needs. He and his staff are highly professional in every aspect. Easy and comfortable feeling talking with him, and he understands … More your needs and explains your legal advice in a way you can understand. Enough just cant be said. Thank You Sir.Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
John was kind enough to assist me with legal advise on my firearm gun rights restoration. I highly recommend him and his firm. Very professional and knowledgeable. If I need assistance … More in the future I will definitely go back to him.
-
What I liked the most was that he actually returned my phone after leaving a message unlike pretty much everyone else I called prior. He listened and answered my question with the best … More advice that would benefit me the most. I was actually lost from moving to Texas from a different state we’re laws vary and he pointed me toward the right direction to get a understanding of if I need to do business with him now or after I contact a lawyer in my home state.
-
John T Floyd handled my sons case & got a dismissal for us! He is great to work with, gets back to you promptly & knows what he’s doing. Definitely one of the best we have had … More to deal with!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
John is honestly the best! The whole team is. He answered me in a timely manner and helped me when my friend was going through a situation in Houston, Texas as an inmate. He was so … More thorough, honest, and without charging me sent me so much information because I was out of the loop. He never once tried to take you for your money, he did all that he could to. help me and I can't thank him enough.
-
I have used John on two occasions and found him to have full knowledge of Texas law, diligent, creative in plan, and aggressive in defense. He is the best criminal defense attorney … More in the State of Texas. No reason to look elsewhere.
-
I have been calling to get some legal advice pertaining to gun rights. A few legal offices would not even take my call because quote " your not a client and Im losing money. … More I I called John T. Floyd Law Firm and they were not only able to answer my question, but gave great detail information, and further elaborated on their answer. I hope I do not have to use them in the future, but if I do need to, they will be my first call.
-
Great lawyer! Needed some advice and gave me a Consultation, and advice for steps to take, without any hassle l, Was a honest guy and actually wanted to help me and not just take my … More money! Highly recommend!!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
Attorney Floyd replied very timely to my inquiry and he provided practical advice. I will not hesitate to contact him in the future if I need additional legal counsel.
-
Highly recommend, down to earth lawyer. Talked to me about my legal issues without being super money hungry and genuinely wanted to help me with my legal problems. 5 stars ⭐️.
-
Very knowledgeable and professional. I called and left a message Friday morning and before end of business that day I received a call back.Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism … More …More -
Very helpful highly recommended for any Question / case will definitely keep he's name and number for any other legal advice
-
Excellent service and a lawyer that doesn't lie. He does what he says. JW recommends him.
-
One of the best services Ive used in awhile. Thank you for all the help and answers. You got my life back. Thank youPositive
Quality …More -
Im impressed. This guy was polite and professional and most important...he listened.
-
Good experience and very good lawyer
-
-
-
Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, ValueMore -
It was a pleasure speaking with John. He is knowledgeable and has a true desire to help the people of society. I turned to him for some guidance of a long-standing issue. He never … More rushed our conversation and went out of his way to look into the details to provide the right answer as well as assist me anyway he could. Thank you for our conversations and I wish your and your firm the best. If you need a lawyer, John Floyd is your guy!
-
John represented me in court for roughly 2 years. I won't (and shouldn't) get into any serious details, but let me tell you that I couldn't have chosen anyone better. … More Seriously.Every appearance in court I felt very comfortable. The judge and DA's had a high regard for his reputation. There is a time I recall where simply his presence greatly impacted the court's interpretation of my case and persons. We were in front of the stand and the judge could not stop talking about John's prestige and past accomplishments and how that took in relation to my case. I kept silent in front of the judge, but I observed then that John's popularity and reputation within the court had already given me a better looking rapport with the judge. Let me tell you, I never had more confidence then, knowing that the judge held him in such high regard.This is not to mention how personable John is. I'll be honest that during the stress of court, sharing a laugh with your lawyer helps a lot. This may sound a lot, but I really appreciated the relationship we had then. This is also not to mention that he was able to deal very well with any DA that rotated over the years. Seriously, John was great, prompt with information and very hands on with my case. I had great peace those 2 years until everything wrapped up.If you're looking for a lawyer, I highly, HIGHLY recommend the John T. Floyd Law Firm. He IS nationally renowned, you know. He'll get the job done to the utmost confidence. He's very experienced and has a great record to boot. I am glad to have had him represent me in court and trust me that I never thought I'd ever say that (and whoever does?). We explored every avenue of victory together and I personally enjoyed the experience, despite the seriousness of the accusation.If you have a case that needs to be represented at the highest levels, choose John T. Floyd. He's a good man and very good at what he does. Him and his team has the experience you need to make the best decisions and options to get the best outcome for your case. We got the best result I could possibly ask for, thank God.Seriously. Hire John. He knows what he's doing.Seriously.
-
One of the few honest lawyers I have ever talked to. His complimentary consultation was knowledgeable and thorough. He knew exactly what the issue was and how to handle it. His candid … More appraisal of the situation and how to proceed saved me thousands of dollars in legal fees. If you have a case requiring expertise in John's area of practice, look no further. Hire this man!
-
I had the opportunity to read an article that Mr. Floyd wrote and it was very interesting. I called him about the article and advice concerning a similar situation. He not only gave … More me excellent advice, he pointed out not just what I wanted to hear but what I needed to hear concerning my situation. The Good, The Bad and The ugly in a manner or speaking. He spoke with an open and honest heart with information to help me and not just to get a client.
-
If you are in trouble and need a lawyer, contact the John T. Floyd law firm. Some of the best lawyers in Texas work there! Understanding and helpful lawyers and staff that will do all … More they can to help you 😊
-
He gave me one of the most honest answers I have received in a very long time about any issue I was having with anything. Legal or not legal. I highly recommend giving him a call and … More will be referring him to friends and family if they have any issues in the future.Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
He took time out of his day to answer my legal questions and didn’t even charge me. I would definitely recommend him to you.
-
Gave free consultation on getting gun rights back. He truly cares about gun rights and getting you the help you deserve. 100% worth a callPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, … More Value …More -
Very professional, great quality work, and very friendly and helpful. Overall, their service is phenomenal. I recommend Mr. Floyd to anyone.
-
Mr. Floyd took the time to explain his experience with the law to me in layman's terms. Definitely give him a call.Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
He was honest , knowledgeable , and professional about what we talked about. Most lawyers are just about the money , but not john.Positive
Professionalism …More -
He was very truthful and honest with us very great man I would recommend him and we would use him again
-
Very professional honest and works hard currently working my husband’s appeal I pray he does his best workPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I contacted John T. Floyd Law firm and I was very satisfied with service extremely helpful and friendly thank you Mr. FloydPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More … More -
This law frim was informative,great response time ,and the attorney called back not some secretary or legal assistant thank u guys for all your help wish it was more like youPositive … More
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I would highly recommend Mr Floyd. He was very helpful and knowledge with a legal question I had.Positive
Professionalism …More -
He explained my case better then any other lawyerPositive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
Very informative
-
-
-
-
Had the pleasure speaking with John Floyd on a personal matter, he was very responsive, nothing but exceptional, and he really cares about you with sincerity and most importantly knows … More what is he talking about! No games or bs, his approach to my situation even though I knew it was probably way smaller then what he normally takes on, he was extremely helpful and didn't care about the size of the matter like other attorneys do. He really looked out for my best interests. You can tell he has decades of experience doing what he does just by chatting with him. I would highly recommend him.
-
Words can’t describe how grateful I am for working with John, he went above and beyond my expectation. I was wrongly accused and hired many lawyers before hiring John Floyd but they … More all disappointed me, I had lost hope until a friend of mine referred me to John. From the start he had my best interest in mind and gave helpful advice, he explained the process and guided me. He put more work and time than all my previous lawyers that cost me thousands of dollars. He was constantly communicating with court and defended me more than all lawyer i had hired before him. Don’t waste your time and money like I did, believe me when I say I hired countless lawyers before him and no one came close to John. I’m forever thankful for him for fighting for my innocence and getting my case dismissed. Thank you so much🙏🏼🙏🏼
-
I called Mr Floyd and left a message, with in the hour I received a call back with much more information then I could have ever expected. Mr Floyd was very informative on every question … More I had for him. He seemed like he cared, instead of like most attorneys that you talk to that are just out for a quick buck. If you want someone that is going to shoot strait with you, and has your best interest in hand, this is you guy. This was the best experience that I have ever had with an lawyer.
-
I can state with confidence that Mr. Floyd and his team are the most competent and professional lawyers one can hope for. My case was quite complex and I admit that as a law student … More I was not the most patient client. Mr. Floyd did a phenomenal job of managing the bench, prosecution and myself! The result was above expectation, and I will never hesitate to recommend this firm regardless of the caliber of the case at issue.
-
It was a pleasure working with Mr. Floyd. I contacted him regarding a legal matter and he was extremely knowledgeable about the law, and responded in a timely manner. I appreciated … More the fact I did not feel rushed, and he made sure he thoroughly answered all questions I had. I would highly recommend him!Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism …More -
Spoke with John Floyd about a 45 year old criminal case I was involved in. I had very little information about the case and John helped me search what records were available and gave … More me guidance to find more information. He was very professional and took his time helping me. I may need to hire a lawyer on this case and Mr. Floyd will be the man.Thanks John.
-
Very professional and straight forward. He's not going to waste your time or money. Very knowledgeable in a large range of possible matters one could face living in these days … More and times. If ever you need legal assistance, this is who I would suggest. Awesome!Positive
Responsiveness, Quality, Professionalism, Value …More -
I called about some legal questions I needed to get clarified and John was able to give me clarification and sound advice. I will definitely contact John for all future legal questions … More and issues.Thank you John!Positive
Responsiveness, Professionalism, Value …More -
Knows his stuff and well respected with DA and judges. I have referred him a couple times and every client has been satisfied
-
John is beyond knowledgeable! If I decide to pursue my case any further I would only have him represent me.
-
What a great attorney, this guy really took time out of his day to answer my questions and explain my case to me. Very grateful, thank you so muchPositive
Professionalism …More -
Absolutely a very professional lawyer. Very well read in the current law and more than willing to help if needed.
-
Mr. John he’s a professional he knows what he’s doing and he’s patient they recommend Him stronglyPositive
Professionalism …More -
Great service, very knowledgable and happy to help with any questions I had
-
Quick to action and helpful and knowledgeable with entertainment industry based issues!
-
Responded on a holiday week. Very knowledgeable and reassuring.
-
Very professional
-
-
-
-
I want to thank John T. Floyd and all of his team. He is the best lawyer who cares aboutHis clients and fights really hard to get the best outcome. He is a fighter and he is awesome!!!I … More recommend if any one needs criminal defense , he is the BEST. We had a really serious caseAnd we are very thankful for the outcome. Thank you John!!!!! God bless you!!!!!!
-
The attorneys at John T. Floyd Law Firm work diligently to achieve the best possible results for their clients. They are caring and knowledgeable professionals. Their expertise in the … More law and their experience as trial attorneys makes them the right choice as a defense attorney. I recommend this law firm highly.
-
From beginning to end this firm handled my case like the top tier professionals they are. I would not trust ANYONE else with my legal needs after having less than stellar experiences … More with other teams. Thank you Floyd!!!
-
I really felt like the team cared about my case and am super satisfied with the outcome. Would not recommend anyone else!
-
These guys do amazing work and have phenomenal service! Hands down best in the Houston area!!
-
John and Chris are true professionals! Love those guys like family!
-
Mr. Floyd and his team are very knowledgeable, informative, and helpful.
-
A team you can depend on to stand up and fight for you to prove the truth the whole truth!
-
-
Mr. John T. Floyd represented me.I couldn't be happier with the outcome he managed to achieve on an VERY Important case that was dismissed the day of Trial. He is patient & … More very knowledgeable of the legal system. I HIGHLY recommend him to anyone in need of a lawyer!John, I am forever grateful & satisfied with the effort you put forth & all you did for me. Thank you isn't enough!God bless you & your family!
-
The John T. Floyd Law Firm assisted me, and I can tell you that the attorney took the time to answer my questions, and I didn't feel rushed or dismissed as I have experienced in … More the past with attorneys. The attorney was very nice and extremely knowledgeable. Initial impressions and continued excellent customer service are big factors for me and as such I would highly recommend this firm.
-
I thank you for your efforts to help Felons regain their Civil rights, and for the information on possession , I am A convicted Felon, no violent history. I am an expert shot, I am … More 76 yoa, and very concerned about the present lake of Security in our State and Country. God Bless and Prosper you in your efforts, Your friend, Sonny Bivens
-
I really appreciated both Chris and John helping with my legal questions and concerns. Both are good guys and I would not hesitate to recommend them.
-
Extremely helpful!!! Helping me understand the law.
John T. Floyd is Board Certified in Criminal Law By the Texas Board of Legal Specialization
Request A Confidential Consultation
Fields marked with an * are required
"*" indicates required fields
Copyright © 2024 John T. Floyd Law Firm • All rights reserved.
Designed & Developed by
