CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

Criminal Law Blog by Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Mr. Billy Sinclair

February 4, 2011

THE INNOCENCE PERCENTAGE

46,000 Innocent Lives Destroyed by False Allegations, Wrongful Convictions

By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair

Seton Hall University School of Law Professor D. Michael Risinger in 2007 published the results of a study, Innocents Convicted: An Empirically Justified Wrong Conviction Rate, in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (Vol. 97, No. 3) which said that between 3.3 and 5 percent of all capital rape-murder convictions in this country involve innocent defendants. Going even lower than Professor Risinger’s 3.3 percentage, Radley Balko, senior editor of Reason Magazine, utilized the nation’s prison population in this country in 2008 and a 2% wrongful conviction rate to conclude there were at least 46,000 innocent people incarcerated in the nation’s prison system.  46,000.00!

Released from the Texas prison system in October 2008, Tony Hall now claims that he was one of those 46,000 innocent inmates—and there is compelling evidence to support his claim as recently reported in the Lufkin Daily News (here, here, and here). In 1993 Hall was living in Hudson, Texas with a woman who had a 7-year-old son. The boy reportedly made an outcry to his mother that Hall had sexually molested him. Hall denied the accusations. He was nonetheless indicted, and on May 13, 1993, following a three-hour trial before an Angelina County judge, he was found guilty. Five months later Hall was sentenced to 15 years in prison by the same judge. Hall had rejected repeated advice by his defense attorney to accept a 10-year probation which would have required a guilty plea admission.

Hall was sent to the Texas prison system, which leads the nation in sexual violence and assaults, where he was repeatedly raped and physically abused because he was a hated “child molester.” Hall tried to tell everyone he was innocent. No one listened—not even the Texas Board of Pardon and Paroles before whom his case appeared every two years. To secure parole in this state (and for that matter any state in the country) an inmate must admit his guilt, accept responsibility for his crime, and express remorse about it. Hall would not have any of this because, as he explained to the parole authorities, he was innocent.

As a result, Hall served every day of his 15-year term only to find after his 2008 release from prison that he walked into an even more terrifying position in the free world: he became a “registered sex offender,” a stigma similar to the “child molester” moniker he had endure in prison. Behind the barbed wire and gun towers, Hall had only to worry about avoiding the next rape or physical beating, while in the free world he had to avoid being falsely accused of another sex offense or violating the conditions of his sex offender registration. He told Lufkin Daily News reporter Jessica Cooley that he could not even take his Shih Tzu out for a walk without being made to feel like a monster.

(more…)

October 1, 2009

SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION LAWS BEG REFORM

Some in Law Enforcement, Legislatures, Find Federal Sex Offender Registration Laws Too Broad, Onerous

By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair

In April 2009 CNN reported that there are 38 states in these United States which require juveniles convicted of sex offenses to “register” as sex offenders. The Houston Chronicle (September 21, 2009) featured a front page article by Renee C. Lee (“A Long Wait to Get Past Crime”) which reported that there are approximately 3,600 registered juvenile sex offenders in the State of Texas, according to the Texas Department of Public Safety. The newspaper noted that eleven of these juveniles were ten years of age when they were registered.

The increased number of juveniles being compelled to register as “sex offenders” when convicted of any sex-related offense is a direct result of the 2006 Adam Walsh Child Protect and Safety Act. Title I of the Walsh Act is called the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”) which expanded the National Sex Offender Registry and established sanctions up to a maximum of twenty years for sex offenders who do not comply with the law’s registration requirements. SORNA applies to all 50 states, the District of Columbia, the five principal U.S. territories (Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico), and the federal Indian tribes whose jurisdictions are defined by the statute.

But with its frequency of application to juveniles, SORNA has triggered a growing debate among child protection advocates who favor registration of all sex offenders regardless of age and some who say the registration law creates more harm than good when it comes to juvenile sex offenders. A growing number of law enforcement officials have weighed in on the debate saying the by placing so many relatively minor sex offenders—such as most juveniles—in the sex offender registry limits their ability to track far more dangerous sex predators. And some state legislatures such as California, already faced with dire fiscal restraints on their budgets, have begun to seriously question the costs involved in tracking non-dangerous, especially juvenile. sex offenders through sex offender registries.

In a March 1, 2008 article (The Walsh Act And Its “SORNA” Implications), we reported about the growing dissatisfaction in Texas among “an unlikely coalition of law-and-order conservatives: victims’ rights advocates, prosecutors, and ‘tough-on-crime’ legislators. These critics now believe that SORNA is too costly, unnecessarily strict, and has the potential of harming the very victims it was designed to protect.” (more…)

Powered by WordPress © 2010 John T. Floyd III Crimnal Defense Attorney : Webmaster Kevin Grey Lee