<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION &#187; orensic evidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/tag/orensic-evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog</link>
	<description>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION: Criminal Law Blog by Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Mr. Billy Sinclair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>MORE EVIDENCE OF BAD EVIDENCE &#8211; AGAIN</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2010/01/29/more-evidence-of-bad-evidence-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2010/01/29/more-evidence-of-bad-evidence-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johntfloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Houston Criminal Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fingerprinting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical forensic experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orensic evidence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Criminal Defense Attorneys Must Question Findings, Conclusions of Forensic Experts

By:  Houston Criminal Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair

We have posted a number of blogs about the “junk science” associated with forensic evidence—a science popularized by network television with drams like “CSI” and its spin-offs. It would indeed by an ideal world if all the evidence-gathering and analysis reflected in these TV programs reflected the real world of crime and criminal prosecutions. The reality is that while these shows may entertain their legion of loyal viewers,]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2010/01/29/more-evidence-of-bad-evidence-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

