<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION &#187; Objections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/tag/objections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog</link>
	<description>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION: Criminal Law Blog by Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Mr. Billy Sinclair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>TRIAL OBJECTIONS MUST BE CLEAR AND PRECISE</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/08/15/trial-objections-must-be-clear-and-precise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/08/15/trial-objections-must-be-clear-and-precise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johntfloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drug Defense Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Objections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Finds Lawyer’s Careful and Repeated Objections did not Preserve Error

By: Houston Criminal Defense Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair

Criminal trials are governed by strict rules of evidence and procedures. It is the duty of a defense attorney to not only know but understand these rules and procedures precisely. We have written several times in the past about the harm caused by a defense attorney’s inadvertent failure to make specific, timely and properly lodged objections during the course of a criminal trial. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals recently delivered that same unreasonable message once again and in no uncertain terms. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/08/15/trial-objections-must-be-clear-and-precise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OBJECTIONS, BOLSTERING, AND APPELLATE REVIEW</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/02/14/objections-bolstering-and-appellate-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/02/14/objections-bolstering-and-appellate-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johntfloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Child Abuse Crimes Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appellate review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bolstering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child sex crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impermissible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Objections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Objections to Bolstering Testimony Should Communicate Evidentiary Basis, The Texas Rules of Evidence, Article 103, requires that a timely objection be based on a specific ground in order to preserve for appellate review an alleged trial error concerning the admissibility of evidence.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/02/14/objections-bolstering-and-appellate-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HEARSAY EVIDENCE, OBJECTIONS</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2008/10/26/hearsay-evidence-objections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2008/10/26/hearsay-evidence-objections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johntfloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[federal Appeals Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearsay Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Objections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Critical Need For Timely And Specific Objections During A Criminal Trial

By Houston Criminal Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair

There is rarely a time when a defense attorney does not find the need to object during a criminal trial because the prosecution either attempts to introduce inadmissible evidence or engages in some questionable conduct concerning the proffer of evidence.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2008/10/26/hearsay-evidence-objections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

