<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION &#187; law and order</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/tag/law-and-order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog</link>
	<description>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION: Criminal Law Blog by Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Mr. Billy Sinclair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>THE MAGIC DNA BULLET LOSES SOME OF ITS LUSTER</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/08/19/the-magic-dna-bullet-loses-some-of-its-luster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/08/19/the-magic-dna-bullet-loses-some-of-its-luster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johntfloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Houston Criminal Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fabricate evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensic evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law and order]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fabricating Fake DNA, Defending the Accused in the New World

By: Houston Criminal Defense Attorney John Floyd and Billy Sinclair, Paralegal

We have blogged on several occasions in the recent past about the fallibility of forensic evidence, sharing the opinion of others that more often than not it’s “junk science.” However, DNA evidence has generally remained insulated from the ever increasing scientific indictment of forensic evidence in general. Not any more. The New York Times recently reported (August 18, 2009) about a paper published online by the journal Forensic Science Internal: Genetics. Citing this authoritative paper, the Times reported that scientists in Israel have established that it is now possible to fabricate DNA evidence, “undermining the credibility of what has been the gold standard of proof in criminal cases.”]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/08/19/the-magic-dna-bullet-loses-some-of-its-luster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

