<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION &#187; judge kent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/tag/judge-kent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog</link>
	<description>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION: Criminal Law Blog by Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Mr. Billy Sinclair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>JUDGE SAMUEL KENT: SHOULD HE BE IMPEACHED?</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/05/12/judge-samuel-kent-should-he-be-impeached/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/05/12/judge-samuel-kent-should-he-be-impeached/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johntfloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Houston Criminal Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge kent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SHOULD HE CONTINUE TO RECEIVE HIS PENSION?

By: Houston Criminal Defense Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair

These two questions have stirred considerable debate in both the legal community and general public in south Texas. Normally it is not a subject that would provoke a response by us. But the tenor of those demanding the impeachment of Judge Kent and those who have said he should not receive his pension have caused us some concern. Now that the federal judge has sentenced to 33 months in prison, we decided to weigh in on these two important questions.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/05/12/judge-samuel-kent-should-he-be-impeached/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

