<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION &#187; impermissible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/tag/impermissible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog</link>
	<description>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION: Criminal Law Blog by Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Mr. Billy Sinclair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>OBJECTIONS, BOLSTERING, AND APPELLATE REVIEW</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/02/14/objections-bolstering-and-appellate-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/02/14/objections-bolstering-and-appellate-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johntfloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Child Abuse Crimes Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appellate review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bolstering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child sex crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impermissible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Objections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Objections to Bolstering Testimony Should Communicate Evidentiary Basis, The Texas Rules of Evidence, Article 103, requires that a timely objection be based on a specific ground in order to preserve for appellate review an alleged trial error concerning the admissibility of evidence.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/02/14/objections-bolstering-and-appellate-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

