CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

Criminal Law Blog by Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Mr. Billy Sinclair

May 15, 2010

THE FLAWS OF TEXAS EXPUNCTION STATUTE

Client Acquitted by Jury but Still Branded by Criminal Records, Background Checks

By: Houston Criminal Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair

In 2008 and 2009, The John T. Floyd Law Firm won three acquittals in the cases of Michael Serges, whose ordeal in the Harris County court system was the subject of a Houston Press feature story reporter Chris Vogel.

Serges had been wrongly charged with seven cases of various sex crimes against children, involving allegations made by five different children.

After facing three acquittals, not guilty verdicts, in the first two Serges trials, and with a newly elected District Attorney in town, prosecutors announced they would not proceed with the four remaining cases it had filed against him and dismissed those charges.

That prosecutorial decision proved to be a sticky-wicket for us. We wanted to seek an expunction of Serges’ arrest and trial records on the three acquitted cases and the arrest record on the four dismissed cases, but we quickly remembered that Texas’ expunction law created some sizeable obstacles for us. Let’s begin with the expunction statute itself. Article 55.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure requires that the following conditions be met before an expunction can occur:

“(a) A person who has been placed under a custodial or noncustodial arrest for commission of either a felony or misdemeanor is entitled to have all records and files relating to the arrest expunged if:
(1) the person is tried for the offense for which the person was arrested and is:
(A) acquitted by the trial court, except as provided by Subsection (c) of this section; or
(c) A court may not order the expunction of records and files relating to an arrest for an offense for which a person is subsequently acquitted, whether by the trial court or the court of criminal appeals, if the offense for which the person was acquitted arose out of a criminal episode, as defined by Section 3.01, Penal Code the person was convicted of or remains subject to prosecution for at least one other offense occurring during the criminal episode.”

(more…)

November 23, 2008

RIGHT TO EXPUNCTION OF CRIMINAL RECORD UNDER § 55.01

Filed under: Houston Criminal Lawyer — Tags: , , , — johntfloyd @ 3:14 pm

Erasing Criminal Records After Dismissal, Acquittal, Pardon or False Identification

By:  Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair

Criminal Defense Lawyers often get call from potential clients wanting their criminal records expunged/destroyed.  However, the expunction statute in Texas is very specific and applies only to records of arrest when a case against a defendant is dismissed with no probation, no billed by a grand jury, acquitted by the trial court or the court of criminal appeals or the result of identity theft.

Individuals who cases were dismissed after successfully completing a deferred adjudication are not entitled to an expunction.  However, they may have there criminal records hidden from public view if the criminal court issues an order of nondisclosure after the applicable waiting periods have expired.  A order of nondisclosure prevents release of the information to the public but does not prevent disclosure to law enforcement and other state agencies.  Orders of Nondisclosure are governed by Texas Government Code Sec. 411.081.

Expunctions:

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 55.01 provides:

(a) A person who has been placed under … arrest for commission of either a felony or misdemeanor is entitled to have all records and files relating to the arrest expunged if:

(1) the person is tried for the offense for which the person was arrested and is:
(A) acquitted by the trial court, …; or
(B) convicted and subsequently pardoned; or

(2) each of the following conditions exists:

(A) an indictment or information charging the person with commission of a felony has not been presented against the person for an offense arising out of the transaction for which the person was arrested or, if an indictment or information charging the person with commission of a felony was presented, the indictment or information has been dismissed or quashed, and: (more…)

Powered by WordPress © 2010 John T. Floyd III Crimnal Defense Attorney : Webmaster Kevin Grey Lee