<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION &#187; evidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/tag/evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog</link>
	<description>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION: Criminal Law Blog by Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Mr. Billy Sinclair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>DOUBLE STANDARD OF EVIDENCE IN CONRAD MURRAY TRIAL</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2011/09/08/double-standard-of-evidence-in-conray-murray-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2011/09/08/double-standard-of-evidence-in-conray-murray-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johntfloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Defense Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manslaughter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedophilia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair

Jury selection has begun in the high profile criminal case against Dr. Conrad Murray, the physician charged with involuntary manslaughter in the drug overdose and death of Michael Jackson.  This comes the day after a California Court of Appeals denied Murray’s request to have the jury sequestered in what will assuredly be intense media coverage and “expert” speculation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2011/09/08/double-standard-of-evidence-in-conray-murray-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TRIAL OBJECTIONS MUST BE CLEAR AND PRECISE</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/08/15/trial-objections-must-be-clear-and-precise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/08/15/trial-objections-must-be-clear-and-precise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johntfloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drug Defense Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Objections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Finds Lawyer’s Careful and Repeated Objections did not Preserve Error

By: Houston Criminal Defense Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair

Criminal trials are governed by strict rules of evidence and procedures. It is the duty of a defense attorney to not only know but understand these rules and procedures precisely. We have written several times in the past about the harm caused by a defense attorney’s inadvertent failure to make specific, timely and properly lodged objections during the course of a criminal trial. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals recently delivered that same unreasonable message once again and in no uncertain terms. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/08/15/trial-objections-must-be-clear-and-precise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>STANDARDS OF PROOF</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/01/08/standards-of-proof/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/01/08/standards-of-proof/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johntfloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Houston Criminal Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exonerations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable Doubt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reasonable Doubt; Foundation of a Free Society

By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Mr. Billy Sinclair

Every one has heard of the phrase “proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” But there are three primary standards of proof: preponderance of evidence; clear and convincing evidence; and reasonable doubt. Black’s Law Dictionary (8th Ed. 1990) provides the definitions of each in order of importance:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/01/08/standards-of-proof/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

