<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION &#187; Dog Scent Lineups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/tag/dog-scent-lineups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog</link>
	<description>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION: Criminal Law Blog by Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Mr. Billy Sinclair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>THE JUNK SCIENCE OF DOG SCENT LINEUPS</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/10/02/the-junk-science-of-dog-scent-lineups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/10/02/the-junk-science-of-dog-scent-lineups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johntfloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Houston Criminal Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA exonerations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dog Scent Lineups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false accusations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false forensic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Popular Law Enforcement Dog Handler Discredited After False Results, Exaggerated Claims of Accuracy Exposed

By: Houston Criminal Defense Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair

We have blogged (False Forensics: An Attorney’s Worst Nightmare, May 1, 2009) in the past about the dangers of “false forensic” evidence being used in courtrooms to convict innocent people. The New York-based Innocence Project reported in 2007 that 65% of the nation’s first 200 DNA exonerations in this country involved fraudulent, unreliable or limited forensic science. Wrongful convictions based on false forensics—or what is commonly referred to as “junk science”—in the State of Texas occur with the same or at a greater frequency.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/10/02/the-junk-science-of-dog-scent-lineups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

