<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION &#187; child indecency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/tag/child-indecency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog</link>
	<description>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION: Criminal Law Blog by Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Mr. Billy Sinclair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>DEFENDING AGAINST JUROR BIAS IN SEX CRIMES</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2010/12/16/defending-against-juror-bias-in-sex-crimes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2010/12/16/defending-against-juror-bias-in-sex-crimes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johntfloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Child Abuse Crimes Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child indecency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child molester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[juror bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voir dire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voir Dire, Inability to Consider Full Range of Punishment: Proper Objection and Practice to Preserve Error for Appeal

By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair

Sex offenses involving children are beyond a doubt the most difficult to defend, particularly when the allegations appear compelling and the witnesses are believable (here, here, and here).  These kinds of sexual assault allegations are easy to indict and even easier to prosecute. All the prosecution needs is the victim’s testimony to secure and sustain a conviction. These offenses are difficult to defend because potential jurors enter the trial setting with a predisposed bias against anyone charged with a sex offense against a child. While the defense counsel tries to exclude these biased jurors from the jury, either through peremptory challenges or challenges for cause, too many effectively conceal their bias in order to serve and convict. These jurors want to be part of a process that convicts the insidious “child molester.”]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2010/12/16/defending-against-juror-bias-in-sex-crimes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PROBATION ELIGIBILITY: NEW LIMITATIONS</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2008/12/12/probation-eligibility-new-limitations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2008/12/12/probation-eligibility-new-limitations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johntfloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Houston Criminal Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child indecency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Supervision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sworn motion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas Juries Can No Longer Recommend Community Supervision When Victim is Child Under 15, Elderly or Disabled

By: Houston Criminal Defense Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair 

Community supervision, or probation as most people know it, has been defined by federal courts as an “imprisonment substitute” because the criminal sentence is not served in a penal institution. See: United States v. Elkins, 176 F.3d 1016, 1020 (7th Cir. 1999).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2008/12/12/probation-eligibility-new-limitations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

