By Houston Criminal Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair
If you were raped at age nine by your local YMCA counselor, do you think you would endure what is known in legal parlance as “future mental anguish?”
At least one Texas court of appeals did not think so: the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas.
The case originated in San Antonio. The local YMCA owns and operates a summer camp called Camp Flaming Arrow (CPA). The parents of a nine-year-old boy enrolled their son into CPA’s summer program. Beginning in 1998, CPA employed a counselor named Kenneth Trimble. In the Spring of 2000 YMCA learned that Trimble had been arrested for sexually molesting 20 children at CPA during his two-year employment. One of those was nine-year-old “Adam Adams” (a court-designated name). Trimble confessed that he had “sexually inappropriate contact” with young Adam. See: YMCA v. Adams, 220 S.W.3d 1, 2-3 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2007). The court of appeals described that “sexually inappropriate contact” as follows:
“A. A. testified that one night he awoke screaming and Trimble went over to check on him but got into his bed and was bumping him. Both A. A. and Trimble were fully clothed. Apparently, this was the only incident occurring between A. A. and Trimble.” Id., at 3.
Adam’s parents sued the YMCA under the theory that its negligence in hiring, retaining, and supervising Trimble caused Adam’s injury. A civil jury returned a verdict with the following findings:
Trimble intentionally and knowingly caused serious mental impairment or injury to Adam;
YMCA’s negligence caused the injury;
Responsibility for the injury should be apportioned 95% to Trimble and 5% to YMCA; and
While Adam sustained no past mental anguish, he would probably sustain $500,000 in future mental anguish damages.


