<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THESE ARE DANGEROUS TIMES IN WHICH WE LIVE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2010/01/14/these-are-dangerous-times-in-which-we-live/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2010/01/14/these-are-dangerous-times-in-which-we-live/</link>
	<description>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION: Criminal Law Blog by Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Mr. Billy Sinclair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:52:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: buy uggs cheap</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2010/01/14/these-are-dangerous-times-in-which-we-live/comment-page-1/#comment-3332</link>
		<dc:creator>buy uggs cheap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=344#comment-3332</guid>
		<description>I have discovered that good real estate agents just about everywhere are getting set to FSBO Promoting. They are acknowledging that it&#039;s not only placing a poster in the front place. It&#039;s really concerning building human relationships with these traders who someday will become buyers. So, if you give your time and effort to encouraging these retailers go it alone -- the &quot;Law connected with Reciprocity&quot; kicks in. Interesting blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have discovered that good real estate agents just about everywhere are getting set to FSBO Promoting. They are acknowledging that it&#8217;s not only placing a poster in the front place. It&#8217;s really concerning building human relationships with these traders who someday will become buyers. So, if you give your time and effort to encouraging these retailers go it alone &#8212; the &#8220;Law connected with Reciprocity&#8221; kicks in. Interesting blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://www.eminijuegos.info/</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2010/01/14/these-are-dangerous-times-in-which-we-live/comment-page-1/#comment-2291</link>
		<dc:creator>http://www.eminijuegos.info/</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=344#comment-2291</guid>
		<description>A further issue is that video gaming has become one of the all-time main forms of entertainment for people of all ages. Kids have fun with video games, and adults do, too. The particular XBox 360 is just about the favorite video games systems for those who love to have hundreds of activities available to them, in addition to who like to experiment with live with others all over the world. Thank you for sharing your opinions in THESE ARE DANGEROUS TIMES IN WHICH WE LIVE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A further issue is that video gaming has become one of the all-time main forms of entertainment for people of all ages. Kids have fun with video games, and adults do, too. The particular XBox 360 is just about the favorite video games systems for those who love to have hundreds of activities available to them, in addition to who like to experiment with live with others all over the world. Thank you for sharing your opinions in THESE ARE DANGEROUS TIMES IN WHICH WE LIVE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sex Offender Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2010/01/14/these-are-dangerous-times-in-which-we-live/comment-page-1/#comment-877</link>
		<dc:creator>Sex Offender Issues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=344#comment-877</guid>
		<description>http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com

I am totally against ANY form of abuse to any human being. And I believe anyone who murders another human being should be in prison for the rest of their life (until they die). I do not believe in the death penalty for anyone. Also, I believe that once a person has been in and out of prison and has served their probation and parole, done everything required of them, and what was signed on the &quot;contract&quot; when they took the plea, none of this should be required of them, none of it. The state cannot tear up a contract like this, which they are basically doing, it&#039;s unconstitutional. Many people, if they had known they would be faced with all this, they would have NOT taken a plea deal. And the courts are very aware of this and this is why they made it retroactive; thus violating ex-post facto laws! They should be allowed to get on with their life as if nothing happened. I&#039;m not saying for it to be removed from their record, but, the crime should be removed from public view and background checks, they should not have any more restrictions, shaming, etc. If they commit another crime, then they face a lot more punishment, like everything else is treated. 

When are we going to move away from being &quot;TOUGH ON CRIME&quot; and move to being &quot;SMART ON CRIME?&quot; If you locked every single sex offender up, at this moment, or killed every one of them, do you think the problem is over? No, more will follow. 

I&#039;ve heard many people say &quot;If these laws protect one child, then they are worth it!&quot; And at the same time, if millions are tortured, it&#039;s ok. Offenders are losing their homes, jobs, families, and children and cannot find new jobs or homes due to the insanity of these laws. The families are also made into outcasts for associating with or being related to an ex-offender and their own children are harassed and bullied at schools due to a family member being an ex-offender. 

I know these laws are a sensitive issue, but as all issues, they must be discussed and we must come up with a valid solution that will work. The laws, as they exist now, DO NOT WORK! People are always saying they cause unintended consequences. These laws have been on the books for years now, so nothing is unintended anymore. When are we going to set aside fear, hate, rage and anger and come up with a real solution? History has proven that these feelings NEVER get good laws passed but only create bad ones that punish and torture many people. These knee-jerk reactions to a slim number of high-profile crimes, like Adam Walsh and Jessica Lunsford, MUST STOP!

When an ex-offender is forced to move from his/her home, thus having to sell it, cannot find another home within the law due to the residency &quot;buffer&quot; zones, get fired from their jobs due to being on the registry, cannot find a new job due to being on the registry, their husband/wife lose their jobs due to a significant other being on the registry, their children lose their friends and are harassed and bullied in school due to a family member being on the registry, thus destroying the children&#039;s lives, ex-offenders are forced into homelessness and to live under bridges, harassed by police, neighbors and probation/parole officers, have to wear &quot;I&#039;m a sex offender T-shirt&quot; or have a neon green license plate on ALL their cars, have &quot;sex offender&quot; on their drivers license and forced to renew their licenses every year, forced from shelters during tornadoes or hurricanes, cannot give blood at some places due to being discriminated against for being on the sex offender registry, denied housing due to being on the registry, signs placed in their yards inviting harassment and ridicule from the neighbors, forced to move when the neighbors start picketing outside the ex-offenders home, the list is endless. 

I THINK THIS IS CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT, BEYOND THE EXTREME!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com?referer=');">http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com</a></p>
<p>I am totally against ANY form of abuse to any human being. And I believe anyone who murders another human being should be in prison for the rest of their life (until they die). I do not believe in the death penalty for anyone. Also, I believe that once a person has been in and out of prison and has served their probation and parole, done everything required of them, and what was signed on the &#8220;contract&#8221; when they took the plea, none of this should be required of them, none of it. The state cannot tear up a contract like this, which they are basically doing, it&#8217;s unconstitutional. Many people, if they had known they would be faced with all this, they would have NOT taken a plea deal. And the courts are very aware of this and this is why they made it retroactive; thus violating ex-post facto laws! They should be allowed to get on with their life as if nothing happened. I&#8217;m not saying for it to be removed from their record, but, the crime should be removed from public view and background checks, they should not have any more restrictions, shaming, etc. If they commit another crime, then they face a lot more punishment, like everything else is treated. </p>
<p>When are we going to move away from being &#8220;TOUGH ON CRIME&#8221; and move to being &#8220;SMART ON CRIME?&#8221; If you locked every single sex offender up, at this moment, or killed every one of them, do you think the problem is over? No, more will follow. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard many people say &#8220;If these laws protect one child, then they are worth it!&#8221; And at the same time, if millions are tortured, it&#8217;s ok. Offenders are losing their homes, jobs, families, and children and cannot find new jobs or homes due to the insanity of these laws. The families are also made into outcasts for associating with or being related to an ex-offender and their own children are harassed and bullied at schools due to a family member being an ex-offender. </p>
<p>I know these laws are a sensitive issue, but as all issues, they must be discussed and we must come up with a valid solution that will work. The laws, as they exist now, DO NOT WORK! People are always saying they cause unintended consequences. These laws have been on the books for years now, so nothing is unintended anymore. When are we going to set aside fear, hate, rage and anger and come up with a real solution? History has proven that these feelings NEVER get good laws passed but only create bad ones that punish and torture many people. These knee-jerk reactions to a slim number of high-profile crimes, like Adam Walsh and Jessica Lunsford, MUST STOP!</p>
<p>When an ex-offender is forced to move from his/her home, thus having to sell it, cannot find another home within the law due to the residency &#8220;buffer&#8221; zones, get fired from their jobs due to being on the registry, cannot find a new job due to being on the registry, their husband/wife lose their jobs due to a significant other being on the registry, their children lose their friends and are harassed and bullied in school due to a family member being on the registry, thus destroying the children&#8217;s lives, ex-offenders are forced into homelessness and to live under bridges, harassed by police, neighbors and probation/parole officers, have to wear &#8220;I&#8217;m a sex offender T-shirt&#8221; or have a neon green license plate on ALL their cars, have &#8220;sex offender&#8221; on their drivers license and forced to renew their licenses every year, forced from shelters during tornadoes or hurricanes, cannot give blood at some places due to being discriminated against for being on the sex offender registry, denied housing due to being on the registry, signs placed in their yards inviting harassment and ridicule from the neighbors, forced to move when the neighbors start picketing outside the ex-offenders home, the list is endless. </p>
<p>I THINK THIS IS CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT, BEYOND THE EXTREME!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DenierDenierDenier</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2010/01/14/these-are-dangerous-times-in-which-we-live/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>DenierDenierDenier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=344#comment-875</guid>
		<description>This is supposing all those committed are  actually sex offenders.

It seems we never learn.  How many stories from the past where perfectly &#039;normal&#039; people were committed to mental hospitals just to get them out of the way or for political reasons?

We have a system that openly convicts innocent people.  An unfounded accusation has sent countless innocent people to prison.

People who &quot;Are In Denial&quot; are deemed &#039;most dangerous&#039; and sentenced to harsh prison terms where they are required to confess the crime.  They will not get out if they don&#039;t confess the crime.  They cannot &#039;comply with treatment&#039; is they are in fact innocent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is supposing all those committed are  actually sex offenders.</p>
<p>It seems we never learn.  How many stories from the past where perfectly &#8216;normal&#8217; people were committed to mental hospitals just to get them out of the way or for political reasons?</p>
<p>We have a system that openly convicts innocent people.  An unfounded accusation has sent countless innocent people to prison.</p>
<p>People who &#8220;Are In Denial&#8221; are deemed &#8216;most dangerous&#8217; and sentenced to harsh prison terms where they are required to confess the crime.  They will not get out if they don&#8217;t confess the crime.  They cannot &#8216;comply with treatment&#8217; is they are in fact innocent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THe One</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2010/01/14/these-are-dangerous-times-in-which-we-live/comment-page-1/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>THe One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=344#comment-874</guid>
		<description>The Adam Walsh Act has been a hotbed of controversy since its inception. And I am amazed this civil commitment issue has been in the forefront of new stories since the Comstock case went before SCOTUS, seeing as how the issue has been largely neglected outside a few NY Times articles. But the point is that civil commitment laws are merely a way for prosecutors to circumvent constitutional safeguards and detaining individuals beyond their completed sentences. 

The standards for civil confinement are not as low as many believe it to be, especially with the lower &quot;mental abnormality/ personality disorder&quot; standard set by Kansas v. Hendricks. There is a psychological term called &quot;NOS,&quot; or &quot;not otherwise specified,&quot; a psychiatric diagnoses that basically means you have some symptoms of mental illness but not enough for a diagnosis of personality disorder. That&#039;s like quarantine for tuberculosis simply because someone has a cough. And judges have great discretion in accepting or rejecting actuarial test results and can rule on mere suspicion. 

http://www.oncefallen.com/civilcommitment.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Adam Walsh Act has been a hotbed of controversy since its inception. And I am amazed this civil commitment issue has been in the forefront of new stories since the Comstock case went before SCOTUS, seeing as how the issue has been largely neglected outside a few NY Times articles. But the point is that civil commitment laws are merely a way for prosecutors to circumvent constitutional safeguards and detaining individuals beyond their completed sentences. </p>
<p>The standards for civil confinement are not as low as many believe it to be, especially with the lower &#8220;mental abnormality/ personality disorder&#8221; standard set by Kansas v. Hendricks. There is a psychological term called &#8220;NOS,&#8221; or &#8220;not otherwise specified,&#8221; a psychiatric diagnoses that basically means you have some symptoms of mental illness but not enough for a diagnosis of personality disorder. That&#8217;s like quarantine for tuberculosis simply because someone has a cough. And judges have great discretion in accepting or rejecting actuarial test results and can rule on mere suspicion. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.oncefallen.com/civilcommitment.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.oncefallen.com/civilcommitment.html?referer=');">http://www.oncefallen.com/civilcommitment.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheeple Herder</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2010/01/14/these-are-dangerous-times-in-which-we-live/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheeple Herder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=344#comment-873</guid>
		<description>I just cannot believe that more people do not understand that the minute the government is allowed these powers over sex offenders it will just be the beginning.

Will pre crime be the wave of the future? Dui offenders Kill and injure thousands of children a year will they be next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just cannot believe that more people do not understand that the minute the government is allowed these powers over sex offenders it will just be the beginning.</p>
<p>Will pre crime be the wave of the future? Dui offenders Kill and injure thousands of children a year will they be next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

