<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ONLINE SOLICITATION OF A MINOR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/01/02/online-solicitation-of-a-minor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/01/02/online-solicitation-of-a-minor/</link>
	<description>CRIMINAL JURISDICTION: Criminal Law Blog by Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Mr. Billy Sinclair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:21:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Neely</title>
		<link>http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2009/01/02/online-solicitation-of-a-minor/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Neely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/?p=100#comment-250</guid>
		<description>In my opinion the statute will withstand any constitional challenge.  The Texas scheme requries that the communication be &quot;knowingly.&quot;  In addition,the communication includes an intent requirment.  The statute reads ...&quot;with the intent that the minor engage in sexual contact....&quot;  At the moment, I am undertaking a first amendment challenge to an Arkansas statute that requires no scienter or criminal intent to be found guilty.  The Texas statute is very well written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion the statute will withstand any constitional challenge.  The Texas scheme requries that the communication be &#8220;knowingly.&#8221;  In addition,the communication includes an intent requirment.  The statute reads &#8230;&#8221;with the intent that the minor engage in sexual contact&#8230;.&#8221;  At the moment, I am undertaking a first amendment challenge to an Arkansas statute that requires no scienter or criminal intent to be found guilty.  The Texas statute is very well written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
